(Deleted last comments because having two was silly - I guessed, then corrected myself because I'd been looking for something physically missing.)
Hmm, thinking on it - I keep being told "Most people who are legally blind can see something" so I wondered if the intent was for people who are unable to see enough to read small lettering, but would be able to pick up on light vs dark?
Not that I could notice (I pretty much had the same reaction when I saw it). And the Braille text says "door unlocked/locked when lit", just as the print text.
We're almost totally blind, except for light perception, but from the sound of it those are teeny, tiny lights. And even with our light perception, in a lit bathroom, and as small as they sound, we wouldn't be able to see them. On top of that, we'd practically have to jam our face against the sign to see the lights at all, even if the bathroom were pitch dark.
IIRC, these were 1-1.5 in. wide (the squarish bit showing a padlock, which is lit solid and thus presumably easiest to see). Maybe 2 in. at the outside. Not that it would matter to someone with no light perception at all.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Hmm, thinking on it - I keep being told "Most people who are legally blind can see something" so I wondered if the intent was for people who are unable to see enough to read small lettering, but would be able to pick up on light vs dark?
...or am I giving them too much credit?
no subject
no subject
no subject
okay, that's total fail.
no subject
maybe
okay, that's total fail.
it is.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
We're almost totally blind, except for light perception, but from the sound of it those are teeny, tiny lights. And even with our light perception, in a lit bathroom, and as small as they sound, we wouldn't be able to see them. On top of that, we'd practically have to jam our face against the sign to see the lights at all, even if the bathroom were pitch dark.
In short... FAIL!
no subject