jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)
Jack ([personal profile] jackandahat) wrote in [community profile] accessibility_fail2011-05-07 08:41 am

YouTube, bless them.

They're trying. They're really trying. But after yet another person went on about how autocaptioning was "close enough", I grabbed the last video I'd had open and took a look at just how close the autocaptioning was to what I could hear. (Disclaimer - I am hard of hearing, but I lipread pretty well, so I think I know what they were saying.)

15 errors in 25 seconds of video.

Several of these totally changed the plot, some were just damn silly.

Expanded on here, now with bonus Cosby Show!
codeman38: Osaka from Azumanga Daioh: 'I live in my own little world, but it's OK... they know me here!' (own little world)

[personal profile] codeman38 2011-05-07 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
The obvious solution to that would be moderation, so that the video producer could outsource them but would have to give the final OK for them to show up.

But of course, Google wouldn't bother to implement something like that, now, would they?

[personal profile] treeowl 2011-05-08 04:19 am (UTC)(link)
They would need a lot more infrastructure than you're suggesting. How would the moderators be chosen? There would need to be an awful lot of moderators. How would they prevent the knuckle-draggers from overwhelming the moderators with a flood of crud?
codeman38: Osaka from Azumanga Daioh surrounded by Japanese kana, translated as 'Get it together!' (get it together)

[personal profile] codeman38 2011-05-08 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, good point. I was thinking it could be handled just like comments, with the video editor doing all the moderation... but then I consider just how frustrating it is to have to delete horrible comments. -_-;;

[personal profile] treeowl 2011-05-08 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
It wouldn't be bad to offer that as an option to the video uploader, I suppose, but I'm not suer it's the best way to handle it.