jadelennox: out of spoons (gimp: no spoons)
jadelennox ([personal profile] jadelennox) wrote in [community profile] accessibility_fail2011-03-23 11:13 am

bad advice from a university

How to select adaptive technology as GIFTS for people.

Explain how the gift can help them pursue their leisure interests. "Help them recognize that they have a need for this technology," York said. [...] "They need to accept their limitations."


I am utterly appalled. Buying somebody adaptive tech as a gift is a nice idea, but it has to be part of a collaborative process. You can't surprise somebody with adaptive technology. You can work with the recipient to find out something they've been wanting, or you could show them some interesting adaptive technology and explain why you think they might like it.

Even at the lowest tier this is true. I have two bottle openers for screw caps: the one somebody bought me as the gift and the one that works with my hands. One of the things this article suggests is buying people "large-print playing cards, playing card holders, talking dice and/or dice with large labels." Which is a great idea! Except there are number of playing card holders on the market and several of them I know I can't use.

In other words, I reiterate, you cannot surprise people with gifts of adaptive technology. Ask us. Work with us.
sami: (Default)

[personal profile] sami 2011-03-24 05:36 am (UTC)(link)
I read the whole article. All of it drips with condescension. "Balls that flash or make noises" - hey, if I knew a kid who would be helped by that, I'd still be tailoring the gift to the kid's own tastes. It's so damn reductionist, like the only thing to consider in buying a gift for a person with disabilities is the disability.