codeman38: Osaka from Azumanga Daioh pulling chopsticks apart, with the caption 'Easily Amused.' (easily amused)
Cody B. ([personal profile] codeman38) wrote in [community profile] accessibility_fail2010-09-15 10:15 pm

No wonder advertisers fail so much at accessibility

This is absolutely brilliant:

Digital Agencies of the Future

For those who can't see the images, it's a bunch of screenshots of advertising agency sites as viewed in Mobile Safari with no available Flash plugin. Almost all of them, with very few exceptions, say something to the effect of "You must have Flash to view this site." Some of them didn't even change the basic boilerplate text in their Flash detection script. And some of them don't even try to detect it, and just show one big missing plugin icon.

(And it's not just mobile browsers where this is an issue. Flash is only accessible on Windows, when it's even accessible in the first place-- there's no screen reader support built into the plugin on Mac or Linux. And the sites look just as barren on my spare PowerPC Linux box, as Adobe simply does not make a plugin for that processor/OS combination.)
sophie: A cartoon-like representation of a girl standing on a hill, with brown hair, blue eyes, a flowery top, and blue skirt. ☀ (Default)

[personal profile] sophie 2010-09-25 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Running Flashblock isn't quite the same as disabling Flash; websites that use detection code to find if you're running Flash will (generally) haver the test pass even if you're running Flashblock - although depending on the way they test for it, sometimes it won't be detected. If the site in question is one that's even *partially* accessible in its Flash site without needing Flash (which does sometimes happen) then it's obviously better to be taken there anyway rather than having a detection fail and no way to even get there.