xen (
xenakis) wrote in
accessibility_fail2009-06-15 12:53 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Accessibility Win!
Because they exist, too!
As an architectural intern, I have to deal with issues of accessibility and universal design all the time. That means to be concerned not only with the minimum dimensions required by the building code (yeah, how'd you guys like them 1:12 ramps? pff!) but to think about the wider issues of location of accessible entrances, barrier-free routes, legibility of signage, etc. It's pretty hard and frustrating sometimes, but I try to see the ADA regulations as opportunities for innovative design. One pretty wicked example of this is the stair/ramp designed by Cornelia Oberlander and Arthur Erikson in Robson Square, Vancouver:

The "Stramp", as we call it, pretty much embodies the idea of universal design: to make one feature accessible to everyone. You wouldn't know it looking at the amount of fail you encounter in buildings, but we are actually taught these things in school (ok, it was an elective, and three of us took it, which is probably one of the reasons for the failfest...) Architects are usually pretty on board with coming up with solutions like this - none of us want the ugly lifts or endless ramps to mess up our beautiful facades - but it is often quite hard to convince clients or city officials to spend extra money or "waste" space on integrated design... What they need to understand is that people with disabilities are not the only ones helped by these changes: parents with strollers, elderly men and women, people who just want to take the scenic route up the building, everyone benefits from them.
As an architectural intern, I have to deal with issues of accessibility and universal design all the time. That means to be concerned not only with the minimum dimensions required by the building code (yeah, how'd you guys like them 1:12 ramps? pff!) but to think about the wider issues of location of accessible entrances, barrier-free routes, legibility of signage, etc. It's pretty hard and frustrating sometimes, but I try to see the ADA regulations as opportunities for innovative design. One pretty wicked example of this is the stair/ramp designed by Cornelia Oberlander and Arthur Erikson in Robson Square, Vancouver:

The "Stramp", as we call it, pretty much embodies the idea of universal design: to make one feature accessible to everyone. You wouldn't know it looking at the amount of fail you encounter in buildings, but we are actually taught these things in school (ok, it was an elective, and three of us took it, which is probably one of the reasons for the failfest...) Architects are usually pretty on board with coming up with solutions like this - none of us want the ugly lifts or endless ramps to mess up our beautiful facades - but it is often quite hard to convince clients or city officials to spend extra money or "waste" space on integrated design... What they need to understand is that people with disabilities are not the only ones helped by these changes: parents with strollers, elderly men and women, people who just want to take the scenic route up the building, everyone benefits from them.
no subject
no subject
no subject
So very true! Our local library is on a somewhat steep hill, so they added a far more accessible ramp that winds around in front of the building. All the little kids adore it. They get to go the long fun way, while their parents walk up the boring adult way.
(Also, that stair/ramp is amazing.)
no subject
Those of you who actually use chairs or work closely with chair users, am I being overly paranoid here?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It's very pretty, though! And I love the idea of it. Thanks for posting it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Any other cool things you and the other two learned in that class?
no subject
There was This Is Not the Barrier Free Path You're Looking For (aka it don't matter if the walls of your bathroom are plastered with grab bars if the door is two inches narrower than a standard wheelchair). Then there was Why It's Not a Good Idea to Stick your Ramp on the Random Back Door Nobody Uses (aka if the guy in the wheelchair is the only one needing that door, chances are there'll be 5 feet of snow on top of that ramp in January. oops) And also Try To Roll in my Wheels for a While (aka you never knew your university campus was so freaking *hilly* until they asked you to climb across it by the strength of your arms)
All things considered, it was pretty educational ;)
no subject