. Secondly, I think you're confusing the speech output of screen reader software with the vocal stylings of a human narrator.
I'm sure I am. Since I know nothing except that they read webpages aloud (and I may even be off-base on that), I'm trying to learn from those who are familiar with screen-reader use.
As long as you provide structural information, it's safe to assume that users of screen reader are familiar with variations in font presentation.
This throws me for a loop. Are you saying that a screen-reader has the capability to distinguish between [1] a block of three paragraphs that are italicized to indicate a dream sequence (and therefore not to be spoken with extra emphasis), versus [2] two or three italicized words in dialog that are intended to be read/spoken with emphasis?
it's safer (and more respectful) to assume all readers have the same toolkit
See, I'm really trying to be respectful... which I thought would be to signal the screen-reader which italics were 'important' enough to be spoken with vocal emphasis. (Not using 'cite' - someone else explained why that is wrong - but using [span:italics] or [em].)
I'm sorry. I know I seem stuck on this, but I use a lot of italics in my fanfic, although probably only about 50% is inflected words in dialog. I'm just hung up with doing something wrong and accidentally making it less comfortable for screen-reader use, instead of more accessible. .
no subject
Secondly, I think you're confusing the speech output of screen reader software with the vocal stylings of a human narrator.
I'm sure I am. Since I know nothing except that they read webpages aloud (and I may even be off-base on that), I'm trying to learn from those who are familiar with screen-reader use.
As long as you provide structural information, it's safe to assume that users of screen reader are familiar with variations in font presentation.
This throws me for a loop. Are you saying that a screen-reader has the capability to distinguish between [1] a block of three paragraphs that are italicized to indicate a dream sequence (and therefore not to be spoken with extra emphasis), versus [2] two or three italicized words in dialog that are intended to be read/spoken with emphasis?
it's safer (and more respectful) to assume all readers have the same toolkit
See, I'm really trying to be respectful... which I thought would be to signal the screen-reader which italics were 'important' enough to be spoken with vocal emphasis. (Not using 'cite' - someone else explained why that is wrong - but using [span:italics] or [em].)
I'm sorry. I know I seem stuck on this, but I use a lot of italics in my fanfic, although probably only about 50% is inflected words in dialog. I'm just hung up with doing something wrong and accidentally making it less comfortable for screen-reader use, instead of more accessible.
.